Opinion | Using Nakamoto Consensus and Mining Parliament to deal with Bitcoin network problems

Opinion | Using Nakamoto Consensus and Mining Parliament to deal with Bitcoin network problems

On June 28, Bitcoin Cash supporter Javier Gonzalez announced the launch of an interesting protocol called Bitcoin Mining Parliament (BMP). The theory behind BMP is that "miners are the executors of Bitcoin" and "any required rules and incentives can be enforced through this consensus mechanism" in Nakamoto Consensus.

Building a virtual and transparent Bitcoin mining parliament

The Satoshi Nakamoto system created more than 10 years ago has changed the lives of many people and even the course of history. The technology released by Satoshi Nakamoto has many advantages, but one of Bitcoin's core innovations is the Nakamoto consensus, a method that keeps the network in a state of effective consensus despite imperfect information. The Nakamoto consensus uses proof of work, block selection, and reward structures to incentivize network participants to act in concert.

There is some debate about whether non-mining nodes have power and the high concentration of mining nodes, and Gonzalez believes that miners are the enforcers of Bitcoin for a variety of reasons. Developers have launched a new open source protocol called Bitcoin Mining Parliament (BMP) and a mining pool called Bmp.virtualpol.com for miners to use the protocol. Currently, the BMP project's readme specification details that the platform is still in early testing, but the tool is currently in use; at the time of writing, 124 miners are participating in the BMP mining pool, and the interface shows how to use hash power to vote on certain matters.

Gonzalez’s BMP theory paper explains: “Miners can write in proportion to their hashrate in a proof-of-work network blockchain, or they can make an extreme decision with enough consensus to write a legal empty block in a minority-supported chain (i.e., the minority must obey the majority) to cause its collapse, which is beneficial to the majority-supported network and their long-term interests.”

The paper further states: Due to the most secure and reliable voting system known, miners can execute very flexibly, accurately and promptly, recording their decisions in a publicly verifiable way. Therefore, miners are in the lead in Bitcoin, and they will never act alone because they are a group of allies with no conflicts of interest (except for competing for computing power).
According to Gonzalez's BMP theory paper, he believes that it is necessary to establish a "virtual and transparent Bitcoin Mining Parliament (BMP)". In this parliamentary miner group, each participant has a say and can "vote by percentage"; BMP can reach an agreement on certain functions, resolve future conflicts, and even designate legitimate spokespersons for the network; they will establish a closer and more accurate connection with Bitcoin's user and developer communities.

Nakamoto Consensus ensures that rules and incentive policies can be implemented

Gonzalez insists that Satoshi Nakamoto created the role of miners because the network’s governance model needed to be delegated to a higher entity more powerful than one person or a small group of developers; miners are rewarded for this, and Gonzalez believes their interests will always be aligned, and he also claims that understanding this predictable pattern and relationship is “a manifestation of Nakamoto consensus.”

“If this information is ignored, every dispute makes the blockchain more fragile — accepting the consensus mechanism means empowering miners to fully exercise their legal power over the blockchain,” the BMP creators’ paper explains. Likewise, accepting this reality guarantees compliance with the last line of the last page of Satoshi’s original paper indefinitely:

“Any necessary rules and incentives can be enforced through this consensus mechanism.”

 

Have we ever used the Nakamoto Consensus Test to resolve disputes?

Of course, this topic has sparked controversy, especially among those who do not believe that miners are responsible for network execution. From the perspective of many, Nakamoto Consensus was not really used during controversial times like Segwit2X. For example, the infamous User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) never happened because Segwit2x was canceled. With over 80% of hashpower willing to implement Segwit2X after managing to activate Segwit, miners never tested their strength by increasing the block size. This was due to threats from a large US short-selling group, which was never reported on social media. So the question remains: could the majority of miners at the time have scaled the block and avoided the UASF issue by utilizing Nakamoto Consensus? We will only know if Nakamoto Consensus is used in this disagreement.

Through concepts like BMP, the mining governance model can essentially avoid such conflicts or end the weak minority chain and not give it a chance to survive. The BMP white paper states that "miners can take responsibility better than anyone else to prevent the risk of such incidents happening again." Gonzalez believes that humans tend to get entangled in these conflicts, and that "with multiple development teams competing, confrontation is only a matter of time - to solve this problem, miners must assume their executive role." Gonzalez said that when the majority of computing power participates, BMP will be a binding force.

 

Parliamentary group governing miners can work without changing BCH protocol

Gonzalez is convinced that the idea of ​​​​BMP can be implemented in various ways without changing the Bitcoin Cash protocol or mining operations. The basis of BMP is registered users who can verify their hashing power. Gonzalez explained that in the coinbase transaction of each block (metadata that can store information in the block reward), the mining pool will publish "the addresses of the main miners in multiple outputs, indicating in OP_RETURN the percentage of hashing power corresponding to each miner." Gonzalez also emphasized that BMP is an "open source tool and is not responsible for actions taken by third parties."

The individual hashrate of each miner is calculated with his quota, which is signaled with the hashrate registered in the block. A mining pool can never control more hashrate than is indicated in its block. In this way, each miner will be able to demonstrate his strength outside the blockchain, proportional to his percentage of hashrate.

Translation: BitcoinCom Chinese website


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. Readers should do their own due diligence before taking any actions related to the aforementioned mining tools or any of their affiliates or services. Bitcoin.com or the author is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.


<<:  Why did the central bank propose to develop digital currency?

>>:  Jiangsu police cracked a major case of stealing electricity to mine Bitcoin

Recommend

JPMorgan Chase: Bitcoin liquidity will gradually recover and remain strong

Earlier this week, Bitcoin saw a sell-off of near...

MoneroV Mining Tutorial - Getting Started Guide

MoneroV - A privacy coin that is designed to be a...

What kind of face would attach great importance to money?

Although there is no need to explain the importan...

Blockchain ownership startup Bitmark raises $1.7 million in seed funding

Bitmark, a Taiwan-based blockchain ownership star...

The most popular palmistry for women

The most popular palmistry for women Whether it i...

How to read women's palms? Analysis of women's palms

Everyone is special, and everyone's palm line...

What aspects of Go are of great interest to you?

When we have nothing to do, we will find some ent...

People with drooping eyebrows and phoenix eyes are both gentle and brave.

Is it good to have double-eyebrows and phoenix ey...

Analyzing worry and love through eyes

Analyzing worry and love through eyes 1. People w...

Internet Watch Foundation and Elliptic Partner to Combat Illegal Use of Bitcoin

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has announced...