Bitcoin block size voting results are out: Core gradually loses its advantage, and the proportion of miners who do not care about the plan increases significantly

Bitcoin block size voting results are out: Core gradually loses its advantage, and the proportion of miners who do not care about the plan increases significantly

The Bitcoin ecosystem has been divided into several camps. With the continued delay of the solution to the Bitcoin network's scaling problem and the continuous proposals for other direct solutions, a very interesting change is happening in the community. It turns out that the majority of miners still support Bitcoin Core in the block size debate, but Core is quickly losing this base.

So far, there have been a number of different proposals being considered to solve the Bitcoin scaling problem. One thing everyone agrees on is how to increase the block size. However, how much to increase remains to be seen. Bitcoin Core, as an important branch of Bitcoin development, is working on a segregated witness solution that guarantees a 2MB block size.

Based on the block size vote, Bitcoin Core only has 27.94% support. However, it is important to remember that a quarter of the community members did not vote, and their preferences are uncertain. However, even if we assume that the 22.01% of miners who did not vote support Core, Core's support rate will not reach 50%.

Miners no longer care about expansion preferences

Bitcoin Classic seems to be the "best solution among other options" at the moment, with 12.2% support. A few months ago, Bitcoin Classic held a hard fork vote to directly increase the block size. This concept has been widely debated because hard forks can bring serious security issues to Bitcoin in the future.

Other solutions, such as Bitcoin Unlimited - 2.54%, BitPay's Bitcoin - 2.45%, BIP100 (directly increase the block size to 8MB) - 3%, all received much less support. However, it is indeed positive to see so many different solutions being considered today. Unfortunately, this also means that a large number of Bitcoin miners no longer care about which solution is chosen, as long as it can be implemented quickly.

More precisely, a total of 26.84% of Bitcoin miners do not care which Bitcoin scaling solution is implemented. However, this does not mean that they no longer care about scaling. The constant fight between different solutions is stressing the Bitcoin ecosystem as a whole. Without a proper solution, the number of miners who do not care about 'who wins' will only increase.

As it stands, Bitcoin’s scaling problem isn’t going to be solved anytime soon. If even miners don’t care which solution to pick, then it’s clear that something needs to change. Scaling — this lingering problem is in desperate need of a solution.

Bitcoin block size voting results table:


<<:  Kazakhstan's attitude towards Bitcoin has changed 180%

>>:  Bitcoin in a Week: Positive news drives price up for 5 consecutive days

Recommend

The location and function of the rich mole on a woman's face

For everyone, the biggest wish is to get rich. Af...

Illustration of nose pointing up

An upturned nose is characterized by an upturned ...

What kind of woman has the best fate?

Everyone has his or her own unique facial feature...

Is it good for a man to have three white eyes?

When we communicate with others, we should always...

The "evil mole" that will affect your fortune

The "evil mole" that will affect your f...

Is a poor woman's face a good sign?

A person's appearance not only gives others a...

What are the characteristics of different eye sizes?

What are the characteristics of different eye siz...

What does it mean when the nose points upward?

What does it mean when the nose points upward? Ev...

Bitcoin cannot be used as currency

Products or services may not be priced in Bitcoin...

How is the fortune of people with moles on their chins?

Regarding each person's external characterist...

Hackers return stolen ETH from SpankChain platform

On October 12, according to Coindesk, a hacker wh...