According to the complaint filed by the SEC with the Connecticut Federal Court, the agency accused
According to the SEC’s complaint: From August to December 2014, Garza and his company sold More than 10,000 investors bought Hashlet contracts, which were touted as always profitable and never outdated. Investors were misled into believing that they would receive ongoing Bitcoin mining income after purchasing these contracts, when in reality GAW Miners had little or no mining power. Because Garza and his company sold far more computing power than they actually owned, they were unable to deliver on the returns they had promised to investors. In the end, most Hashlet investors lost most of their money, and only a few made a profit. The SEC will seek to have Garza disgorge ill-gotten gains and pay interest on civil damages, and the agency is seeking a jury trial, the people said. Original text: http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-271.html |
<<: Can Drivechain make Bitcoin sidechain a reality?
>>: 3 Reasons Onename Switched from Namecoin to Bitcoin
The facial features of a stubborn and headstrong ...
Women born with good fortune From ancient times t...
"Small wealth can be judged by the nose, gre...
In physiognomy, the forehead is where a person...
It is inevitable that we will encounter some diff...
On November 21, "mining machines sold by the...
Purpose: To promote alternative energy sources at...
The creators of Syscoin, a cryptocurrency that re...
It is often said that appearance is determined by...
Palmistry is the most important of all features. ...
Blockchain technology has the potential to advanc...
As the world's leading mining machine manufac...
From which aspects can one directly analyze some ...
Rage Review : Trade finance is being shaped into ...
Some people have moles because they are born with...