On September 4, a report from the legal financial analysis company IntegraFEC showed that EOS's parent company Block.one had a series of suspicious transactions during the ICO, deliberately pushing up the price of EOS and inducing others to buy ICO tokens. If the findings are true, this would violate the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. Over 11 months in 2017 and 2018, a little-known software maker called Block.one raised more than $4 billion in an initial coin offering for a new cryptocurrency, EOS, more than almost any other ICO before it. In 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission fined Block.one $24 million for running an unregistered ICO. EOS token holders sued Block.one last year, calling the sale a "fraudulent scheme" and claiming the company violated securities laws. |
<<: Report: Cryptocurrency to create more than 10,000 jobs in India
>>: Wu said weekly mining information: Ethereum and Fil computing power hit new highs 0830-0905
Every woman hopes to have a happy marriage, but t...
Summary : As consumers continue to increase their...
Compared with the obvious costs of industrializat...
In palmistry, the marriage line represents a pers...
What are flipped ears? What are flipped ears? Is ...
In fact, each of us has many differences. Whether...
1. Cut off the line between the ring finger and t...
What does it mean when a man has thick eyebrows? ...
Google will lift its blanket ban on cryptocurrenc...
The total cryptocurrency market capitalization so...
In the previous article "What are the pitfal...
It is common to have moles on the face, but the e...
Having a house full of children and grandchildren...
The influence of moles on us varies according to ...
The bridge of the nose belongs to our nose, so it...